Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 2006No. COA05-1516Published

1Dissent

---------------*851TYSON, Judge, dissenting.

The majority's opinion erroneously reverses the trial court's judgment granting defendants Bobby Eugene Ingram's ("Ingram") and Lashawnta Annette McLaurin's ("McLaurin") (collectively, "defendants") motions for directed verdict. The majority's opinion cites Racine v. Boege, 6 N.C.App. 341, 169 S.E.2d 913 (1969), and Griffeth v. Watts, 24 N.C.App. 440, 210 S.E.2d 902 (1975), to support its holding that the evidence in this case is sufficient to allow jurors to decide whether either or both Ingram and McLaurin were negligent. In the absence of a prima…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Sowers v. MarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Herring v. Food Lion, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API