Legal Opinion

City of Boston v. Aetna Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1987PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

A judge of the Superior Court has reported the propriety of his orders denying a motion of the plaintiffs for partial summary judgment and allowing motions for partial summary judgment of the defendant insurers. The City seeks to recover from the insurers amounts which the City says the insurers were obliged to pay as benefits under health insurance policies covering patients of the Boston City Hospital (BCH).

We outline the issues in general terms. The insurers’ first series of motions for partial summary judgment concerns the question whether the City has standing to maintain an action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Van Dyke v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Kagan v. Wattendorf & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. All Seasons Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Health & HospitalsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  5. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API