Legal Opinion

Welch v. Wirsching

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1932No. Docket No. 7201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

In an action arising from injuries received by the appellant, a pedestrian, through an accident resulting from the respondent’s automobile having collided with appellant while crossing at an intersection of public streets, judgment was entered upon an instructed verdict in favor of the respondent.

The only question presented as a ground for reversal is as to whether or not the evidence adduced upon the trial was sufficient to require its submission to the jury. It haá been held that the rule is precisely the same as that applied where a motion for a judgment of nonsuit is under consideration.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Burr v. United Railroads of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kohn v. National Film Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Langdon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hausken v. ComanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kuhn v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API