Burr v. United Railroads of S.F.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
In this action, brought to recover damages for the alleged negligent destruction by defendant of plaintiff’s automobile, the court, at the close of plaintiff’s case, granted a nonsuit. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
One of the grounds upon which a nonsuit was asked was “that no negligence has been shown, actionable or otherwise.” The evidence offered by plaintiff tended to show that at a point on the “Mission Road,” a street of the city and county of San Francisco, the defendant, a street railroad corporation, was repairing its track.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by15 opinions
- Long v. John Breuner Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Wright v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Hill v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Brown v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Charves v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.