Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Cochran
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to vacate a judgment and to set aside a default and appearance of a mortgagor, and to dismiss an action. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by one Frank C. Clark from an order denying Ms motion to vacate the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in the above-entitled action, to set aside the default and appearance of defendant Cochran, and to dismiss the action.
The action was instituted by plaintiff on November 19, 1898, to foreclose the lien of two mortgages executed to it by defendant Cochran, against Cochran and defendant Metzger, a junior mortgagee. Notice of Ms pendens was regularly recorded on the same day. „ Cochran had on September 1, 1898, conveyed the property covered by the mortgages to one…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Martin v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Packard Bell Electronics Corp. v. Theseus, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Blackburn v. Bucksport & Elk River Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Harding v. HarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.