Legal Opinion
Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Lewis
California Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1897No. S. F. No. 309PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a writ of assistance. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This cause was submitted to Department One, and on January 23, 1897, the following decision was rendered:
“Searls, C.—Two appeals were taken in this case— one from an order refusing to vacate the judgment and the other from an order granting a writ of assistance. Upon motion of counsel for respondent the appeal from the order refusing to vacate the judgment was dismissed. (Hibernia etc. Soc. v. Lewis, 111 Cal. 519.) It follows that the only questions for consideration are those involved in the appeal from the order granting the writ of assistance.
“The action was brought December 1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- H. Newmark & Co. v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mathews v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Packard Bell Electronics Corp. v. Theseus, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Blackburn v. Bucksport & Elk River Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Cassidy v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.