Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge:
¶ 1 The Residential Utility Consumer Office (“RUCO”) appeals two decisions by the Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) that adopted a system improvement benefits (“SIB”) mechanism permitting Ari*10zona Water Company (“AWC”) to collect surcharges from utility customers in between rate cases for defined capital expenditures. Because we conclude the SIB mechanism does not comply with the Arizona Constitution’s mandate that the Commission determine a public service corporation’s fair value when setting rates, we vacate the approval of that rate-making device. However,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corporation commission/arizona Water CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020