State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. W. F. Cooper, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellee is charged by the information with unlawfully charging and collecting from Alfredo Durazo one dollar for illuminating gas for lighting purposes, whereas the gas actually furnished him was of the value of forty cents. To the information the appellee filed a demurrer, on the *296ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a crime or offense under the laws of Arizona, or at all. The demurrer was sustained, and the state prosecutes this appeal on questions of law only.
The statute law applicable to the case is found in chapter 52, Laws First Special Session of Arizona of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Calumet Service Co. v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Brundage v. BrundageNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- State ex rel. Keyser & Elrod v. HallockNevada Supreme Court · 1879
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.