Legal Opinion

Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corporation commission/arizona Water Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2016No. CV-15-0281-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 The Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) determines the rates that a public service corporation (a “utility”) may charge. The Arizona Constitution requires the Commission to determine the fair value of a utility’s in-state property when setting rates, which historically has occurred in a full rate case. During a full rate case, the Commission scrutinizes a utility’s financial picture and holds many hearings—often extending more than a year. Here the Commission approved a rate increase mechanism known as the system improvements benefit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Scates v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. US West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freeport Minerals Corp. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Aps v. AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
  3. Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service CoArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service CoArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Sun City Home Owners Association v. AccArizona Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API