Bogner v. Eubanks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *
Defendants appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff in a personal injury action. They do not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, nor do they claim excessive damages. But one point is made, error in giving an instruction concerning plaintiff’s right to rely upon the exercise of care by another.
The accident occurred at the intersection of Broadway and Slauson in the city of Los Angeles on a sunny afternoon of August 10,1953. Broadway runs north and south, and Slauson east and west. Slauson had three lanes of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Gilbert v. Pessin Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hughey v. CandoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Stanich v. BUCKLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Rodela v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Kavner v. HolzmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960