Legal Opinion
Ohran v. the County of Yolo
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1940No. Civ. 6245; Civ. 6246; Civ. 6247PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, J., pro tem.
Herein are considered appeals from certain judgments and orders granting motions for new trials in three separate actions, brought by members of two Ohran families against the County of Yolo for damages based upon the liability of said county under the Public Liability Act of 1923 (Stats. 1923, chap. 328, p. 675), which said actions were consolidated for the purposes of trial. The trial was by jury and resulted in the following verdicts and judgments :
In action No. 6245 a verdict and judgment for $2,000 in favor of Carl R. Ohran for damages for the death of his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- County of Todd, Minn. v. LoegeringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Gioldi v. SartorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pritchard v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.