City of Fresno v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: DEFENDANT BOEING’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF THE CITY OF FRESNO’S RCRA CLAIM (Doc. 225)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Defendant the Boeing Company now moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 56, to dismiss the City’s RCRA claim on the ground that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claim under § 113(h) of CERCLA. Alternatively, Boeing argues that the claim is moot because the activities the City seeks to enjoin are already underway, and because there is no imminent and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tri-Realty Co. v. Ursinus CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Eagle Star Rock Products LLC v. PCC Structurals, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Homefed Village III Master, LLC v. Otay Landfill, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Nahum v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020