Legal Opinion

Homefed Village III Master, LLC v. Otay Landfill, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 24, 2024No. 3:20-cv-00784Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, Case No.: 20-cv-0784-AGS-JLB LLC, 4 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO Plaintiff, 5 BIFURCATE (ECF 165, 166, 168) v. 6 OTAY LANDFILL, INC., et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 Plaintiff’s amended complaint includes one purely equitable claim, which is 10 normally tried to a judge alone, and two state-law causes of action, which require a jury 11 trial. Defendants move to bifurcate these claims and try the equitable claim—or at least an 12 element of it—first in a separate bench trial. The key question is whether this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Gregory LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API