Legal Opinion
Tri-Realty Co. v. Ursinus College
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 11-5885PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PRATTER, United States District Judge
Tri-Realty Company (“Tri-Realty”) sued Ursinus College (“Ursinus”), alleging that the continuing effects of No. 6 fuel oil discharged from underground storage tanks (“USTs”) on Ursinus’s property violate the Resource Conservation Restoration Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992k, the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, and several state laws. Ursinus moves for summary judgment on the RCRA and CWA claims. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Ursinus’s Motions for Summary Judgment.
I. Factual…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yadkin Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc. v. Drummond Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Tennessee Clean Water Network v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Town of BarnstableDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.