Legal Opinion

Juneau County State Bank v. State Bank of Mauston

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The mortgagor charged himself with the duty to take out insurance for the benefit of the plaintiff, and was not absolved from that duty by his failure so to do nor by taking insurance in his own name. It is agreed by counsel for both parties that in such a case the mortgagee, as between himself and the mortgagor, is entitled to an equitable lien upon the money due on the insurance policy, although it is made in terms payable to the mortgagor. This is the well settled rule. Lichtstern v. Forehand, ante, p. 216, 194 N. W. 421; Butson v. Misz, 81 Oreg. 607, 160 Pac. 530; 4 Cooley, Ins. 3703, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas PoindexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Brinkman v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Hartung v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Ely v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearson Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Connors v. AaronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dowling v. Sollie & SollieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Koscher v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  5. Matter of J & L Transport, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API