Legal Opinion

Connors v. Aaron

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Ón February 6, 1929, Copeland and Young, who were then owners of the property involved, conveyed it to the defendant Mango by deed, and on the same day assigned to the defendant Mango three insurance policies totaling $16,000. Thereafter the defendant procured further insurance to the extent of $34,000. One policy of the foregoing contained a clause providing that the loss should be payable to the interpleaded defendants as their interest might appear. The rest of the policies were taken in the name of the defendant Mango and contained no such clause. On March 1, 1929, Mango and his wife…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huey Philp v. Ewell, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Juneau County State Bank v. State Bank of MaustonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Sheridan v. Peninsular Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cary Manufacturing Co. v. Acme Brass & Metal WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Koscher v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. Matter of J & L Transport, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API