Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Sollie & Sollie

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 7, 1937No. 4 Div. 940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainants are the members of two law firms, Sollie & Sollie, and Farmer, Merrill & Farmer, who held in trust the sum of $52,500 collected by them in compromise of some eleven insurance policies, totaling the sum of $76,000, issued upon the property of the Rainbow Manufacturing Company, Inc., an insolvent corporation, whose property was destroyed by fire,.and containing simple or open mortgage clauses.

Three of these policies, aggregating $18,-500, were held by H. PI. Dowling, appellant here, payable to him as his interest might appear. Dowling held the first mortgage on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Smith v. GillamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. &198tna Ins. Co. v. KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. King v. Capitol Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Cooper v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Head v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API