Legal Opinion
Negro v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 2014No. H040146PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
This original proceeding arises from efforts by real party in interest Navalimpianti USA, Inc. (Navalimpianti), to obtain copies of e-mail messages stored by real party in interest Google, Inc. (Google), on behalf of petitioner Matteo Negro. Navalimpianti caused a subpoena to be served on Google, which Negro moved to quash. Respondent court denied the motion, and ordered Google to produce the e-mails, based on its conclusion that Negro had consented, or was deemed to have consented, to their production. We hold that this order could not be sustained on the record before…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Facebook, Inc. v. City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- In re Irish Bank Resolution Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- People v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Brinkley v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.