Legal Opinion
John Teixeira v. County of Alameda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 2017No. 13-17132PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge Owens;
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Tallman; Dissent by Judge Bea
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
The County of Alameda seeks to preserve the health and safety of its residents by (1) requiring firearm retailers to obtain a conditional use permit before selling firearms in the County and (2) prohibiting firearm sales near residentially zoned districts, schools and day-care centers, other firearm retailers, and liquor stores. The individual plaintiffs in this case, John Teix-eira, Steve Nobriga, and Gary Gamaza (collectively, “Teixeira”), wished-to open a…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Ivan Pena v. Stephen LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Steven DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- William Drummond v. Robinson TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Virginia Duncan v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.