Legal Opinion
Geib v. McKinney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1992No. 14519PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The named defendants, Walker McKinney and John D. McKinney, Jr., appeal from the judgment of the trial court, on the report and recommendation of an attorney state trial referee, ordering the partition by sale of two parcels of real estate situated in Weston, owned jointly by the defendants and their nephew, the plaintiff, Howell R. Geib III.1
*221The plaintiff commenced two actions pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-495 and 52-500 (a) to partition both the “Birch Hill” property and the “Richardson” property that were held by the parties to this action as joint tenants with an express right of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Delfino v. VealencisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- LaCroix v. LaCroixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Coan v. Bernier (In Re Bernier)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Schmaling v. SchmalingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Fernandes v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.