Legal Opinion
Anschutz Petroleum Marketing Corp. v. E.W. Saybolt & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1986No. 82 Civ. 4498 (CSH)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
In a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated May 3,1985, familiarity with which is assumed, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ third-party complaint. The Court also granted the motion of third-party defendants for summary judgment dismissing that third-party complaint. Finally, the Court granted the motion of plaintiff and third-party defendants for sanctions under Rule 11, F.R.Civ.P.
Counsel for plaintiff and third-party defendants were directed to file and serve affidavits giving the details of expenses and fees incurred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Faraci v. Hickey-Freeman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- In Re ArmwoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- In Re RobinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- Gap v. Puna Geothermal VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.