Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 30, 1977No. Nos. 316, 1202 and 1203, Dockets 76-7252, 76-7253 and 76-7254PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge:

This is the second appeal taken by class members-claimants Bay Fair Shopping Center, et a 1. (“appellants”) from an award of counsel fees to David Berger, Esq. and his law firm, David Berger, P.A. (“appellee”).1 The fees were awarded for work appellee performed in obtaining a common settlement fund for three national classes of plaintiffs in a suit brought against the Grinnell Corporation, et a 1. In the first appeal, City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448 (2d Cir. 1974) (“Grinnell I”), this Court reversed as excessive an initial fee award to appellee of $1.5…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders, and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie & Lerach Molloy, Jones & Donahue, P.C. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Lawrence Laub v. Continental Assurance Company v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Continental Assurance Company v. Berger & Montague, P.A. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API