Liedtke v. Fillenworth
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge
Appellant appeals an adverse judgment. She claims the trial court erred by (1) dismissing her claim under principles of res judicata, (2) enjoining her from bringing further litigation against respondents, and (3) awarding respondents costs and attorneys’ fees. We affirm.
FACTS
This litigation arose from a single car accident on December 26, 1981 in which appellant was driving. Appellant reported the accident to her insurer, Prudential, two days later. Appellant chose Duluth Auto Body to make the needed repairs. Kenneth Hoffman, the Prudential agent, prepared a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Freick v. HinklySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Ryan v. CahillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Love v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Spickler v. Key Bank of Southern MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Wicker v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Nolette v. O'NeilSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996