Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ryan v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1958No. 37,607PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the latest in a series of proceedings seeking to enjoin the alleged unauthorized practice of law by certain persons in the State of Montana. Briefly stated the facts are these: On February 17, 1958, petitioners, acting for themselves and the Committee on the Unlawful Practice of Law of the Montana Bar Association, commenced a class action in the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District of Montana. Named as defendants were the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (hereafter referred to as the Brotherhood) and two of its officers; nine attorneys who are residents of Minnesota and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freick v. HinklySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Flodin v. District Court Fifteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Beede v. FunckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Sharood v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Bowman v. Pamida, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API