Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Reese
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1967No. 8432PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOISE, Justice.
The Attorney General has brought this action seeking to prohibit the respondent, district judge, from proceeding further without allowing petitioner to intervene in an action brought in the name of the State of New Mexico by the district attorney of the First Judicial District in and for Santa Fe County, wherein recovery is sought of certain amounts claimed to have been illegally paid as salary and per diem by the State to John F. Sudderth, Chairman of the State Highway Commission.
Although petitioner sought to intervene by petition in the district court and the court…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Montoya v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Darling Apartment Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
- Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. KozlowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Beckworth v. New Jersey State Parole BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Manchin v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.