Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. Margiotti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1936No. Appeals, 40 and 41PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The broad question here involved is the power and status of the Attorney General in criminal proceedings.

Whether the remedy invoked, quo warranto, is the proper one, under the circumstances, we pass by, in order that important principles in the administration of the criminal law may be settled. The propriety of the remedy was not challenged by the respondent, the Attorney General. It may be open to doubt.

A killing took place in Fayette County on September 12, 1936. Frank C. Monaghan, the man whose life is alleged to have been unlawfully taken, was at the time…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McHaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Snyder's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. KozlowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. State v. EhrlickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Colteryahn Sanitary Dairy v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  5. Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API