Arnav Industries, Inc. v. Dreskin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
There are those who believe that diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1976), is a safeguard that has outlived its usefulness and provides a basis for diverting matters into the federal courts that properly belong in the state courts. Indeed, hardly a year passes without legislation being proposed to eliminate diversity jurisdiction. This action, a landlord-tenant dispute concerning New York State’s complex rent stabilization laws, brought against a New Jersey individual by a New York corporation which hopes to avoid an adverse determination by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marathon Enterprises, Inc. v. FeinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Moos v. WellsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Allman v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Jaffe v. ClarkeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Von Siemens v. AbramcykDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022