Legal Opinion

Marathon Enterprises, Inc. v. Feinberg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 3, 1984No. 83 Civ. 8533PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CANNELLA, Senior District Judge.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b).

FACTS

On August 20, 1970, defendants transferred to plaintiff all outstanding shares of their wholly-owned corporation, Concourse Provision Company [“Concourse Provi sion”], in return for plaintiffs limited shares. Thereafter, Concourse Provision became a division of plaintiff. 1 Following the Agreement and Plan of Acquisition [“August 1970 Agreement”] between the parties, defendants made a series of representations concerning the accuracy of certain financial statements.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. H. Keith Zahn v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. East River Savings Bank v. Secretary of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Continental Cas. Co. v. Stronghold Ins. Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. Long Island Lighting Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  5. Barr v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API