Legal Opinion

County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 12, 1959No. 347PublishedCited by 892 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr.. Justice Brennan

delivered the opinion of the Court.

■This case presents the question whether a District Court may abstain from exercising its properly invoked diver-' *187sity jurisdiction in a state eminent domain case in which the exercise of that jurisdiction would not entail the possibility of a premature and perhaps unnecessary decision of a serious federal constitutional question, would not create the hazard of. unsettling some delicate balance in the area of federal-state relationships, and would not even require the District Court to guess at the resolution of uncertain and difficult…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by892 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

887 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API