Legal Opinion

Moos v. Wells

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 23, 1984No. 84 Civ. 0725 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Walter Moos (“Moos”), a citizen of Canada and putative owner of the second floor loft in the apartment building at 133-35 Greene Street in Manhattan (“Building”), commenced this diversity action to evict and collect back rent from his tenants, defendants Gary Wells (“Wells”) and Terry Tiringer (“Tiringer”), who are New York residents. Defendants have moved to dismiss Moos’ action for failure to state a claim and, alternatively, on the ground that this court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, the court concludes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W. S. Ranch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Construction Aggregates Corp. v. Julia Rivera De VicentyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Canaday v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Rednel Tower, Ltd. v. Riverside Nursing Home (In Re Riverside Nursing Home)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Canaday v. KochDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  4. Taub v. Hershkowitz (In Re Taub)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  5. Coin Call, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API