Legal Opinion
State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2011No. A10-1382PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Heather Marie Nelson challenges the district court’s order requiring her to pay $19,412 as restitution for her misdemeanor theft of tanning services from a Mankato tanning salon. We affirm the district court’s decision to award restitution but modify that award by reducing it to $156, the amount of claimed loss that was caused by appellant’s criminal conduct.
FACTS
On August 20, 2006, C.F., the owner of the tanning salon, discovered that one of her employees was tanning for free after her work shifts ended. The tanning salon used a computer software program to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. TenerelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. PalubickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. RamsayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Welfare of I.N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.