State v. Palubicki
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellant Anthony John Palubicki challenges an order to make restitution payments to K.O. and M.B., children of the man Palubicki was convicted of murdering. Palubicki contends that K.O. and M.B. are not entitled to restitution for their personal losses because they are entitled only to the expenses their father would have incurred had he survived, and even if KO.’s and M.B.’s personal expenses were permitted under Minnesota law, they are not entitled to restitution for expenses incurred while voluntarily attending the trial.
On January 25, 2003, the victim was found…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. FaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. TenerelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. PalubickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. BrownbackMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.