Legal Opinion

Brent L. Dock v. George Latimer, Associate Member, Division of Corrections, State of Utah/board of Pardons, William v. Milliken, Director

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1984No. 82-2558PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHILSON, Senior District Judge.

We refer to the appellant as “Dock” or “plaintiff” and to the appellee as “Latimer” or “defendant”.

In December 1979, the plaintiff, an inmate of the Utah State Prison, filed this action in the Federal District Court in Utah, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976), seeking to recover damages from the Utah State Board of Pardons, George W. Latimer, the Chairman of the Board and William V. Milliken, the Director of Division of Corrections.

The basis of the claim is that the defendants violated his Federal Constitutional rights to due process of law in failing to comply…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Malek v. HaunCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Sumner v. TuckerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  4. Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Baker v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API