Legal Opinion
Malek v. Haun
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1994No. 94-4003PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Louis J. Malek (Malek), appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the district court’s Order which adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Malek’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as “frivolous” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d).
Malek brought this § 1983 action against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chester Russ v. Paul Uppah, Rod Cozzetto, and John R. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Johnson v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Whitesel v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Straley v. Utah Board of PardonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Benavidez v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.