Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Tucker

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 25, 1998No. CIV. A. 3:97cv854PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Marvin Sumner, a Virginia state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pau-peris, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter is before the Court for evaluation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the action was referred to the Magistrate Judge for initial review. Jur isdiction is appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(a)(3).

I.PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 26, 1996, the President signed into law the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”). Among other things,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Scott v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  2. Davis v. StanfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  3. De'Lonta v. FulmoreDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  4. Deblasio v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Taylor v. BarnettDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API