Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Thorne
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1992No. C5-92-453PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant Jane Strauss challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents Dr. Irving Thorne, M.D., and Aspen Medical Group on her claims of defamation, negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
FACTS
On January 20, 1989, Irving Thorne performed a vasectomy on Strauss’ husband, Donald Blyly. Later that day, Strauss telephoned Thorne concerning certain complications Blyly was experiencing and complained that she had not been asked specifically to consent to the operation. On January 24, 1989, Strauss again…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Hill v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Wallin v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.