Legal Opinion

Carrasco v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 19, 1977No. 190-76PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, Senior Judge

In this civilian pay case, plaintiffs are seven present or former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees who accepted temporary overseas assignments with the Foreign Tax ■ Assistance Staff (FTAS) of the Agency for International Development (AID). This case is a sequel to Whelan v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 688, 529 F.2d 1000 (1976).

Plaintiffs contend that, upon expiration of their FTAS assignments, they each were returned to the IRS at an unlawfully low General Schedule (GS) grade and step. Plaintiffs premise their argument upon Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) § 183(10).9(2),1 which provides:

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Albright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Gersten v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Wilmot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Whelan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Crowley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Crispino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Braddock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Waldorf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Flaherty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API