Legal Opinion

Cole v. Holland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1996No. 1994-2569PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 220.] COLE ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HOLLAND; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Cole v. Holland,

1996-Ohio-105.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an underinsurance claim must be paid, when—Determining amount of underinsurance coverage to be paid. __________________ Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an underinsurance claim must be paid when the individual covered by an uninsured/underinsured policy suffers damages that exceed those monies available to be paid by the tortfeasor’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nease v. Medical College HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hill v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clermont Cty. Transp. Improvement Dist. v. TekulveOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API