Legal Opinion
Omlid v. Sweeney
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1992No. Civ. 910324PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
John Sweeney, individually, and doing business as Valley Region Contracting, and Ruth Sweeney, individually, appeal from the judgment of the District Court for Grand Forks County rescinding a purchase contract between the parties. Rodney, Lorrie, Adam, and Aleasha Omlid cross appeal from various portions of the district court’s judgment as well. We reverse and remand.
Rodney and Lorrie Omlid and their two children Aleasha and Adam filed this action against John Sweeney, individually and doing business as Valley Region Contracting, on February 24, 1989, seeking…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Paularena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Joseph D. Griggs v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Daniel Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Murphy v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- American Bank Center v. WiestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.