Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Schumacher

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1991No. Civ. 890180PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Dean Schumacher, and his wife Sandra, appeal from a district court judgment (1) dismissing all claims which were handled by the court as derivative and equitable claims against Mary Schumacher, as personal representative of the estate of Robert 0. Schumacher, her deceased husband; Roam’s Rentals, a North Dakota general partnership (Roam’s); and Schumacher’s of Fargo, Inc., a North Dakota corporation (Schumacher’s), and (2) providing relief to the parties pursuant to a jury verdict. We reverse the judgment in its entirety and remand for a jury trial on the merits of all issues.

A…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Thomas v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Van Pelt v. GreathouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brandt v. SomervilleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Richards v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API