Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1983No. 35798; CA A27603PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff, a general contractor, brought this action to foreclose a construction lien on defendants’ home. The trial court held that the lien was invalid, because plaintiff was not a registered builder at the time he filed the lien, ORS 701.055 et seq, but allowed plaintiff to proceed in quantum meruit. Judgment was entered for plaintiff for $16,006.

On appeal, defendants contend that the trial court erred (1) in failing to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, because he was not a registered builder at the time he filed the action, relying on the version of ORS 701.065 in effect at that time; (2) in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Schwenk v. Boy Scouts of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Mahana v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hill v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mount Hood Community College Ex Rel. K & H Drywall, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Pincetich v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Gourley v. ToweryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Andrew Abraham v. Corizon Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API