Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 27, 1994No. C89-0099CV; CA A73536PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.
This case involves multiple claims between a franchisor, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), and its franchisee, Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc. (Tualatin Tire). Goodyear appeals and Tualatin Tire cross-appeals from a judgment awardingboth parties damages. We reverse and remand on the appeal, and affirm in part and reverse in part on the cross-appeal.
Goodyear manufactures and sells tires. In August, 1986, Marvin Kiehm met with a representative of Goodyear to discuss its franchise program for tire dealerships. Marvin had experience in the automotive industry and wanted to establish a family…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.