Legal Opinion

City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1979No. 403-515, SC 24760; 411-542, SC 24760PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

These two actions, consolidated for trial and on appeal, arise out of the construction of the City of Portland’s secondary sewage treatment facilities. Hoffman Construction Company (Hoffman) was the general contractor on the project. Seaboard Surety Company (Seaboard) is its surety. Donohue & Fleskes Corporation (Donohue) was a subcontractor hired by Hoffman to perform mechanical, piping, and equipment work on the project. Argonaut Insurance Company (Argonaut) is its surety. The City of Portland (City) is a party because Seaboard executed a public performance bond to assure the City of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simpson v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROVIDENCE, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. V. C. Edwards Contracting Co. v. Port of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Holman Transfer Co. v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API