State ex rel. Hipp v. City of North Canton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Hipp asserts in his propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying the requested writ of mandamus.
Mandamus is an appropriate remedy in wrongful-denial-of-promotion cases. Hipp, supra, 70 Ohio St.3d at 103, 637 N.E.2d at 319. In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus regarding his claim for appointment, Hipp had to establish a clear legal right to promotion to lieutenant and back pay, a clear legal duty on the part of appellees to provide the foregoing, and that he had no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Lightfield v. Village of Indian HillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Regetz v. Cleveland Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. East Cleveland Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 500 v. City of East ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Campbell v. Municipal Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McAlpin v. ShireyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. United Auto Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Golem v. Village of Put-In-BayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- State ex rel. Hipp v. N. CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Rimroth v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.