Bituminized Brick & Tile Co. v. Simons Brick Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. J. Ford and Henry G. Bodkin for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The corporation plaintiff in this action of interpleader sought a judgment determining the ownership of certain designated shares of its corporate capital stock. The plaintiff’s complaint proceeded upon the theory that there were conflicting claims to the title of the stock in suit which were being asserted repeatedly by the defendant Simons Brick Company on the one hand and the six other defendants on the other hand. All of the defendants to the action cross-complained and by appropriate allegations pleaded their various claims to the stock in question. The trial court found, among other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massie v. ChatomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dunn v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. GoetheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Snyder v. DobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crane Valley Land Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Broder v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Nishi v. InoguchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931