Legal Opinion

People v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1925No. Docket No. 1190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The defendant was indicted on a charge of embezzlement. From an order denying him a new trial and from a judgment of conviction he has appealed.

The first point which he calls to our attention and which he contends was a reversible error is this: he claims that the properties which it was alleged he embezzled were of such a nature and in such form that they amounted to mere scraps of paper and had no value. That contention is based on these facts:

On the twenty-seventh day of February, 1922, the defendant was a cleric, agent, or servant of the Bank of Italy, a corporation organized and existing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. OldhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. McClellanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. People v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fulshear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Roberts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. MaloryArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. State v. HennemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API