People v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The defendant was indicted on a charge of embezzlement. From an order denying him a new trial and from a judgment of conviction he has appealed.
The first point which he calls to our attention and which he contends was a reversible error is this: he claims that the properties which it was alleged he embezzled were of such a nature and in such form that they amounted to mere scraps of paper and had no value. That contention is based on these facts:
On the twenty-seventh day of February, 1922, the defendant was a cleric, agent, or servant of the Bank of Italy, a corporation organized and existing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. OldhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. McClellanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- People v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Fulshear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Roberts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. MaloryArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- State v. HennemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936