Legal Opinion
Bergholt v. Hudson Motor Car Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1954No. Civ. No. 4371PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
Defendant Hudson Motor Car Company is a Michigan corporation and maintains its principal place of business in that state. It does no business in the State of Minnesota except in so far as its relationship with defendant Hudson Sales Corporation might be construed as establishing such a fact.
The complaint in this action alleges that Hudson Sales does business in the State of Minnesota; that defendant owns and controls the business of Hudson Sales and that “defendants, and each of them, are committing acts of infringement of plaintiff’s certain Letters Patent * * * by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Industrial Research Corp. v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928
- Mas v. Orange-Crush Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- La Varre v. International Paper Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1929
- Favell-Utley Realty Co. v. Harbor Plywood Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berkman v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Ludwig v. General Binding Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- Hudson Minneapolis, Inc. v. Hudson Motor Car Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
- Inland Steel Products Co. v. MPH Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959