Legal Opinion
Favell-Utley Realty Co. v. Harbor Plywood Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 20, 1950No. 29750PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERSKINE, District Judge.
Defendant has moved to quash the return . of service of summons on the ground that ■ the defendant was not and is not subject to service of process in this district. Defendant has also moved to dismiss the action on ground of improper venue in that defendant is not a resident of nor “doing business” in this district, or in lieu thereof to transfer the cause to the Western District of Washington, Southern Division.
The underlying facts are as follows: — In 1947 defendant corporation acquired purchase and cutting rights covering California timber and timberlands, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Echeverry v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanders Associates, Inc. v. The Galion Iron Works & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Gravely Motor Plow & Cultivator Co. v. H. v. Carter Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- William R. Le Vecke and Reed Levecke v. Griesedieck Western Brewery Co., a Corporation, and Carling Brewing Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- W. H. Elliott & Sons Co. v. E. & F. King & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.