Hudson Minneapolis, Inc. v. Hudson Motor Car Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on two motions of defendant, Hudson Motor Car Company, to quash the service of two summonses and to dismiss the action. Both motions are based upon the grounds of the insufficiency of the service of process, and therefore the lack of jurisdiction over the person of defendant.
These motions give rise substantially to the same question which this Court passed upon in Bergholt v. Hudson Motor Car Co., D.C., 124 F.Supp. 716. But plaintiff earnestly urges that the depositions and other showing made herein require a reconsideration of the views…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ladjevardian v. Laidlaw-Coggeshall, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Berkman v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Ludwig v. General Binding Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- Bybee v. Northern Utilities CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1962