Legal Opinion
Mas v. Orange-Crush Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1938No. 4383PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in the District Court, who sued for an accounting of profits arising from the use of an ornamental design for bottles by Orange-Crush Company, appealed from a judgment whereby the service of process upon the defendant by the United States marshal was quashed and the bill of complaint was dismissed. The return of the marshal showed that process was served upon “J. L. Cummings, in person, who is an agent of such corporation, and who resides in said City of Richmond, Virginia, a place within my District”. The defendant appeared specially to question the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Industrial Research Corp. v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928
- Liquid Veneer Corporation v. SmucklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Certain-Teed Products Corporation v. WallingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Botwinick v. Credit Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Empire Steel Corp. of Texas, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Superior Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Jacobowitz v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Fieldcrest Mills, Inc. v. Mohasco Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.